Wit and Whimsy: A Stylistic Exploration of Social Dynamics in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice

Authors

  • Muhammad Ansar Ejaz Visiting Lecturer GCUF, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Ayesha Asghar Gill Assistant Professor UAF, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0064

Keywords:

Pride and Prejudice, writing style, narrative techniques, thematic exploration

Abstract

This study examines the distinctive writing style of Jane Austen in Pride and Prejudice, using Leech and Short (1981) theoretical framework, highlighting its enduring relevance and critical acclaim. Through a comprehensive analysis, the research identifies key elements of Austen's prose, including her use of irony, satire, and social commentary, which serve to critique the societal norms of the Regency era. The novel's dialogue-driven structure is emphasized as a vital component for character development and the portrayal of interpersonal dynamics, inviting readers into the complexities of social interactions. Utilizing narrative techniques such as free indirect discourse and omniscient narration, Austen provides multifaceted perspectives that deepen the understanding of character motivations and societal constraints. The study also explores the significance of Regency-era vocabulary and syntax, illustrating how language reflects social class distinctions and enhances the authenticity of the setting. Ultimately, the findings reveal that Austen's mastery of language, combined with her ability to weave humor and critique into her narrative, results in a timeless exploration of themes such as marriage, class, and human relationships. This analysis positions Pride and Prejudice not only as a reflection of its historical context but also as a relevant commentary on contemporary societal issues, underscoring Austen’s significant contribution to English literature.

Published

2025-03-01

How to Cite

Wit and Whimsy: A Stylistic Exploration of Social Dynamics in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. (2025). ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(1), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0064

Similar Articles

1-10 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.