Uncertainty in Literature: Interpreting Human Existence through Chaos Theory and Heisenberg’s Principle in Classical and Modern Texts

Authors

  • Muhammad Shahid Hussain Lecturer (English), Higher Education Department, Islamabad Author
  • Ayesha Abdul Hameed Lecturer (English), Federal Directorate of Education, Islamabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0096

Abstract

This research paper explains the fundamental premise that human life is inherently characterized by uncertainty, challenging the notion of a deterministic governing principle that can fully predict or guide our existence. It draws upon the insights from both classical literature and modern scientific theories, the study examines how chaos and unpredictability shape our lives, influencing our decisions, actions, and destinies.  Through an analysis of key literary works such as Oedipus Rex, Hamlet, Macbeth, Doctor Faustus, Frankenstein, and Lord of the Flies and some key textual examples, the paper demonstrates how characters grapple with uncertainty, make choices in the face of ambiguity, and experience the consequences of unforeseen events.  Furthermore, the argument is aligned with modern scientific principles, particularly Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and Chaos Theory, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the inherent limitations in predicting and controlling complex systems, including human behavior and social phenomena. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of embracing uncertainty, chaos in one’s life developing resilience, and fostering adaptability in navigating the complexities of life, recognizing that the absence of a fixed path allows for the emergence of novelty, exercising free will with some limitations, allow creativity, and individual effort.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-01

How to Cite

Uncertainty in Literature: Interpreting Human Existence through Chaos Theory and Heisenberg’s Principle in Classical and Modern Texts. (2025). ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(1), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0096