Islamic Jihad: An Antithesis of Marx’s “Opium of the Masses” Theory

Authors

  • Saeed Akhtar Lecturer, Department of Islamic Studies and Religious Affairs, University of Malakand Pakistan Author
  • Imtiaz Ahmad Assistant Professor, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Malakand Pakistan Author
  • Adnan Khan Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Malakand Pakistan Author
  • Ibrahim Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Malakand Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Hussain Lecturer, Department of Sociology, University of Malakand Pakistan Author
  • Farman Ali Assistant Professor, Department of Social Work, University of Malakand Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0063

Keywords:

Religion, Conflict theory, Islam, Oppression, Marginalization

Abstract

Karl Marx's claim that religion serves as the opium of the people suggests that it is often used as a tool to silence the oppressed and make them bear their agonies and sufferings in the name of religion. This study critically examines Marx's assertion, arguing that rather than being an opiate of the masses, Islam challenges social injustice and works as a catalyst for positive social change.Using a qualitative research approach, this study analyzes historical evidence from the Quran, Hadith, and the Prophet's biography to demonstrate how Islam effectively confronted injustice, empowered marginalized communities, and challenged oppressive structures. Through an analytical comparison between Marxist conflict theory and Islamic justice theory, this paper highlights Islam's role in promoting societal transformation rather than being passive. The findings suggest that Islam's emphasis on justice, equality, and resistance to tyranny contradicts the notion that it merely appeases believers and instead portrays it as a force for meaningful reform.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-01

How to Cite

Islamic Jihad: An Antithesis of Marx’s “Opium of the Masses” Theory. (2025). ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(1), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0063

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.