Introduction
ATFJ is firmly committed to the principles of academic honesty, research integrity, and intellectual originality. Plagiarism—intentional or otherwise—compromises the credibility of research and damages scholarly progress. Therefore, ATFJ enforces a strict zero-tolerance plagiarism policy across all stages of manuscript evaluation and publication.
What Constitutes Plagiarism?
Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to:
-
Direct Copying: Verbatim replication of content without quotation marks and citation
-
Improper Paraphrasing: Rewording someone else’s findings or theories without proper credit
-
Data or Visual Reuse: Using graphs, tables, figures, or datasets without acknowledgment
-
Self-Plagiarism: Republishing or reusing substantial portions of one’s own previous work without disclosure
Plagiarism Threshold
| Standard | Allowed Similarity |
|---|---|
| ATFJ Internal Policy | Maximum 19% |
| HEC Pakistan Benchmark | Up to 19% |
Although HEC permits up to 19% similarity, ATFJ adheres to a stricter internal limit of 19% to foster originality and scientific rigor.
Plagiarism Detection & Responsibility
-
All submissions are checked using plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin).
-
Authors bear full responsibility for ensuring that their work is free of plagiarism.
-
Manuscripts exceeding similarity limits are flagged and reviewed by the editorial team for possible action.
⚖️ Editorial Response to Plagiarism
| Type of Violation | Editorial Action |
|---|---|
| Minor (e.g., missing citations, small overlap) | Returned for revision and correction |
| Major (e.g., extensive uncredited copying) | Rejection or retraction (if published) |
| Repeated Offenses | Blacklisting of author(s); institutional notification |
All corresponding authors must submit a signed Statement of Originality, confirming:
-
The manuscript is original and has not been published or submitted elsewhere
-
All sources are properly cited
-
No part of the content is plagiarized or reused without disclosure
AI-Generated Content Policy
ATFJ prohibits the use of AI-generated text, analysis, or visuals (e.g., via ChatGPT, Bard, Claude, Gemini, etc.) in any manuscript submission.
Use of AI-generated content may result in rejection or post-publication retraction.
✅ All content must reflect original human research and scholarly effort.
Appeals Process
If an author disputes a plagiarism finding, they may:
-
File a formal appeal with justification and supporting evidence
-
The ATFJ Editorial Board will conduct a second review and issue a final decision
Transparency and Retraction
In cases of confirmed plagiarism post-publication:
-
A retraction notice will be issued
-
Affected stakeholders and indexing agencies will be notified
-
The case will be handled in alignment with COPE and ICMJE ethical guidelines
By enforcing this policy, ATFJ safeguards the quality, ethics and impact of engineering and technological research.
Archiving Policy
ATFJ is committed to the long-term preservation and accessibility of published scholarly content.
Digital Preservation
The journal utilizes the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN) and other preservation mechanisms available through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform to ensure permanent accessibility of published articles.
Website Backup
Regular backups of journal data, articles, metadata, and system files are maintained to safeguard against accidental loss.
Persistent Access
Published content remains freely available and permanently accessible through the journal website.
Content Preservation
If the journal ceases publication, all published content will remain accessible through preservation services and institutional archives whenever possible.
Peer Review Policy
Overview
ATFJ is committed to publishing high-quality, original, and socially impactful research in the social sciences. The peer review process is central to ensuring scholarly excellence, methodological soundness, and ethical compliance.
All manuscripts submitted to ATFJ undergo a blind peer review to ensure impartiality and eliminate institutional, national, or personal bias.
Review Model: Blind Peer Review from 4 Experts in the same Field
(2 Internal & 2 External)
-
Author Anonymity: Reviewers are not informed of the authors’ identities.
-
Reviewer Anonymity: Authors do not know the reviewers’ identities.
This ensures manuscripts are evaluated solely on their academic merit.
Peer Review Workflow
1. Submission & Initial Editorial Screening
Upon submission via the ATFJ online portal, each manuscript is screened by the editorial office for:
-
Relevance to ATFJ scope and social sciences
-
Adherence to formatting and submission requirements
-
Ethical compliance and documentation
-
Plagiarism check via Turnitin or equivalent (Maximum similarity allowed: 15%)
❌ Submissions not meeting basic criteria are desk-rejected without external review.
2. Reviewer Selection
Eligible manuscripts are assigned to 4 Experts in the same Field (2 Internal & 2 External)
independent reviewers based on:
-
Subject-area expertise
-
Academic and research credentials
-
Absence of conflicts of interest
3. Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on:
-
Originality & Scholarly Contribution
-
Methodological Soundness & Theoretical Grounding
-
Accuracy of Data & Validity of Findings
-
Relevance to Policy, Education, or Social Impact
-
Writing Clarity & Logical Structure
-
Adherence to Ethical Standards
Reviewer Recommendations:
-
✅ Accept
-
✏️ Minor Revisions
-
Major Revisions (with re-review)
-
❌ Reject
4. Editorial Decision
The handling editor consolidates reviewer reports and makes a final decision.
Authors receive:
-
A detailed decision letter
-
Reviewer comments and revision instructions
-
A revision deadline (typically 2–4 weeks)
⏱ Review Timeframe
The peer review process is completed within 4–6 weeks, depending on:
-
Reviewer response time
-
Article complexity
-
Number of revision cycles
Authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit promptly.
✅ Reviewer Ethics & Responsibilities
Reviewers must:
-
Maintain strict confidentiality
-
Provide objective, respectful, and constructive feedback
-
Declare any conflict of interest
-
Uphold fairness, and avoid any form of bias
Reviewers must not:
-
Share manuscript content externally
-
Use unpublished data
-
Contact the author directly
Appeals Process
Authors may appeal an editorial decision by:
-
Submitting a formal written appeal to the Editor-in-Chief
-
Including detailed justification and supporting evidence
The editorial board may seek an independent review, and the final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
⚖️ Ethical Standards
ATFJ aligns with:
-
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)
-
HEC Pakistan publishing quality criteria
-
International publishing best practices
Reviewer Recognition
To acknowledge reviewer contributions:
-
An annual reviewer acknowledgment list is published (with consent)
-
Certificates of recognition are issued on request
-
Top reviewers may be invited to join the Editorial Board
Conclusion
The peer review process at ATFJ reflects our core values:
-
Integrity
-
Academic Rigor
-
Impartiality
-
Social Relevance
By fostering a transparent and ethical review system, ATFJ supports the advancement of scholarship across the social sciences.
Copyright & Licensing Policy
Copyright Policy
The copyright policy of ATFJ is based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but the author(s) are free to publish their work subsequently. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
Licensing Policy
All articles published by ATFJ are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
Under CC BY 4.0, users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, share, adapt, and reuse the content for any lawful purpose, provided proper attribution is given to the original authors.
Repository Policy
Repository & Self-Archiving Policy
ATFJ permits authors to deposit all versions of their work in institutional or other repositories like Research Gate, ORCID, Academia, ArXiv, etc. without embargo, including:
-
Preprint (submitted version)
-
Author’s Accepted Manuscript (AAM)
-
Published Version (Version of Record)
Proper citation to the original published article is required.




