Understanding Machiavelli as an Italian Patriot: Analysis

Authors

  • Anees Khan MPhil Scholar, Department of Political Science, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Author
  • Ihtisham Khan MPhil Scholar, Department of Political Science, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Author
  • Husnul Wahab Department of Political science, Abdul Wali University Mardan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63056/academia.5.3.2026.2534

Keywords:

Niccolò Machiavelli, Political Philosophy, Renaissance Italy, Political Realism, The Prince, Discourses on Livy, Political Leadership, Statecraft, Ethics and Politics, Machiavellianism

Abstract

Machiavelli remains one of the most controversial philosophers in the history of political thought, and his ideas continue to generate significant scholarly debate. While some scholars consider him a true patriot and realist, committed to Italy's political unification and stability, others see him as an unscrupulous and immoral philosopher who advocated deception, immorality, and authoritarian rule. This view is reinforced by the fact that ordinary people use the term Machiavellian in daily life to describe thoughts and actions based on selfishness and cunning, without moral justification. This research paper examines Machiavelli life, political philosophy, and the historical and social conditions that shaped his ideas. The study particularly analyzes his major works, The Prince and Discourse on Livy, to evaluate his concept of political leadership, statecraft, and the relationship between ethics and politics. In terms of research methodology, this qualitative study is based on both primary sources (official documents, etc.) and secondary sources (books, articles, etc.). The findings of the research paper suggest that Machiavelli should be understood within the political realities of Renaissance Italy rather than through purely moral or ethical standards.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Khan, A., Khan, I., & Wahab, H. (2026). Understanding Machiavelli as an Italian Patriot: Analysis. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 5(3), 2631-2635. https://doi.org/10.63056/academia.5.3.2026.2534