Workaholism and Life Orientation: Do We Work To Live or Are We Living to Work?

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between workaholism and life orientation (optimism–pessimism) among working adults in Karachi, Pakistan. A cross-sectional correlational research design was employed using purposive sampling. The sample comprised 120 working adults (58 males, 62 females). Data were collected using the Bergen Work Addiction Scale (BWAS) and the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, independent samples t-test, and one-way ANOVA using SPSS (Version 26). Results indicated a non-significant and weak negative correlation between workaholism and life orientation (r = –.06, p = .49). Significant differences were found in workaholism scores based on working hours, F(2, 117) = 5.50, p < .01, and number of family members, F(2, 117) = 4.89, p < .01. However, no significant difference was observed in life orientation between workaholics and non-workaholics, t(118) = 0.82, p = .41. The findings suggest that while situational factors such as workload and family structure influence workaholism, life orientation may remain relatively stable. Implications for organizational policies and employee well-being interventions are discussed.