Peer Review Policy

Overview

All research articles submitted to AIJNES are subject to rigorous double-blind peer review: the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the process. The journal follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Review Process Step by Step

  • 1. Initial editorial screening (1–2 weeks): the editor checks scope, originality (similarity check), formatting and ethical requirements. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be desk-rejected.
  • 2. Reviewer assignment: each manuscript is sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field, normally up to four (including at least two external to the publisher). Reviewers must have no conflict of interest with the authors.
  • 3. Evaluation: reviewers assess originality, relevance to the journal’s scope, methodological soundness, validity of results and conclusions, clarity, and use of literature.
  • 4. Editorial decision: based on the reviewers’ reports, the handling editor or Editor-in-Chief decides to accept, request minor revisions, request major revisions, or reject.
  • 5. Revision: revised manuscripts are returned with a response to reviewers and may be sent back to the original reviewers.

Timeframe

The peer review process normally takes 4–6 weeks from submission to first decision. Total time to publication depends on the number of revision rounds and on how quickly authors return revisions.

Editorial Decisions and Conflicts of Interest

The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief and is based only on the scholarly merit of the work, never on the author’s affiliation, nationality or ability to pay. Editors who have a conflict of interest with a manuscript withdraw from handling it. Manuscripts submitted by editorial board members are handled by another editor and undergo the same double-blind review, without any involvement of the authoring member.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

  • Keep the manuscript and review process confidential
  • Provide objective, constructive and timely feedback
  • Declare any conflict of interest and decline if one exists
  • Not use unpublished data for personal advantage, or share the manuscript with others or with AI tools
  • Not contact the authors directly

Appeals

Authors who believe a decision was based on an error may submit a written appeal to the Editor-in-Chief at jawad@academia.edu.pk within 30 days, explaining the grounds. The appeal is assessed by an editor not involved in the original decision, who may consult an additional independent reviewer. The appeal decision is final.

Reviewer Recognition

AIJNES acknowledges its reviewers with a review certificate on request and an annual list of reviewers published on the journal website.